Question #1
No, animal testing is not safe for animals -- they are intentionally exposed to toxic, irritating stuff. Animal testing is done to study how chemicals affect tissues and mammals and it is intended to protect humans from potential hazards. Adjectives like "fair" are not applicable anyway. What is fair in this context?
Honestly, the question is phrased in a strange manner. How can experiments be safe? How can they be fair? Better questions would have been whether it is responsible to do so and whether we think they are necessary: Yes, I think animal testing is evil, but it is a necessary evil to protect humans. Yes, most animal testing are performed in a very reasonable and responsible way.
Imagine how many mice and rats are killed everyday by rent-a-kill in private houses and industrial estates. They die cruelly by toxic compounds just because they invade homes and property. Compared to that only very few mice are killed for research.
It is amazing how callous people can be when being affected by mice and rats in their own home and what hypocrites they are when discussing animal testing and using the very same medicines and cosmetics produced with animal testing.
Question #2:
Yes, of course cosmetic manufactures have to ensure that their products are safe. Imagine your baby loosing his eys-sight due to a untested creme!
However, all tests should be made public and no single substance should have to be re-tested if registered in the public test database. This would allow to minimise animal testing drastically. There is no sense in re-testing constituents and mixtures again and again.
Question #3:
No, usually the public including teachers and friends is very hypocritical and desinformed. It is easy to "be against something", but it needs quite a lot of efforts to educate yourself enough to understand why certain animal testing is a necessary evil.
Age: 39
Gender: male
Education: Ph.D. in chemistry
Occupation: Research consultant for analytical and medicinal chemistry