Question:
POLL: Do you think marijuana should be legalized?
anonymous
2012-05-03 19:58:55 UTC
It should! You can't overdose on weed(if you think you can you are stupid). Weed isn't addictive. It is healthier than cigarettes. It would help everything because laws would not have to be enforced so no tax money spent on drug busts. It would give people more jobs instead of some drug dealer selling it on the streets. I'm all for it. What do you think? We need to stop focusing on these "criminals" smoking weed. And focus on criminals like these- http://www.google.com/imgres?num=10&um=1&hl=en&safe=off&biw=1366&bih=643&tbm=isch&tbnid=zBbz0t4Ymgl61M:&imgrefurl=http://www.inquisitr.com/184631/newt-gingrich-wins-south-carolina-primary-video/&docid=E1V_O69SvUF_fM&imgurl=http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2012/01/Newt-Gingrich-Releases-2010-Tax-Return1.jpg&w=413&h=310&ei=vkWjT5WMG8XsggetkvRC&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=427&vpy=189&dur=157&hovh=194&hovw=259&tx=127&ty=112&sig=109576852989931903203&sqi=2&page=1&tbnh=142&tbnw=201&start=0&ndsp=22&ved=1t:429,r:2,s:0,i:125
Twenty answers:
Gorkbark Porkduke Gefunken Fubar
2012-05-07 16:48:57 UTC
No. It is a toxic hallucinogen which serves no useful purpose other than to induce delusional behavior.
anonymous
2012-05-03 20:02:34 UTC
I've never heard a single good argument against legalization.





"I beg to differ. I don't think you can overdose on weed, i know you can. Sure, you'll pass out before you can physically smoke enough to overdose but it's possible to overdose on weed through ingestion.

Didn't think of that did ya, genius?

Whos' stupid now?"



Who the f*ck is going to EAT that much weed? That's not an argument for keeping it criminal at all.



"Weed is mentally addictive. Fact!"



No. It's "addictive" in the same way porn and fast food are. Some people become can become addicted based on their own psychological state. The vast majority of users can quit with little or no withdrawal symptoms, as the actual plant contains no addictive chemicals. Should PornHub and McDonald's be illegal too?



If you had bad experiences with it, sorry, but it doesn't represent everyone. Alcohol has even worse consequences for a lot more people, but that's still legal. Why? Because making it illegal was destructive and a waste of money. Just as it is for marijuana now.



I never said it was risk free, far from it. But driving a car also dangerous if you want to look at it that way. Probably more so. Should that be illegal?



Also, don't call me a pothead, I don't use the drug.



Alright, I give you that, that wasn't the best analogy. But, yeah, I'm not a misinformed YouTube commenter who thinks weed is a completely safe wonder drug. Overall, guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. Thanks to you as well for being civil, it's nice to actually debate something on the internet instead of being yelled at.
anonymous
2012-05-04 11:35:10 UTC
In the US alone, enforcement of cannabis prohibition costs taxpayers around $10 billion each year. If it was taxed and controlled like alcohol, cannabis sales could generate an estimated $6.2 billion in yearly tax revenue. Cannabis has also been shown to ease symptoms of people with HIV/AIDS, cancer, multiple sclerosis and many other medical issues. It has been successfully used to TREAT nausea, appetite issues, glaucoma, muscle spasms, and many other types of pain. In 2010, nearly 45,000 Americans were serving time in state and federal prisons for nonviolent cannabis possession. In that same year, over 700,000 Americans were arrested for the same crime. The estimated total cost to the taxpayers is $9,000,000,000



The arguments for weed are endless: (1) It's impossible to overdose and there is no hangover; (2) People don't get violent when they are on weed like they do on alcohol; (3) Its smoke is not carcinogenic (cancer-causing) like cigarette smoke (and even if that were an issue you can eat it in brownies or use a vaporizer) (4) It's cheaper than alcohol; (5) It's much safer to drive on than alcohol; (6) Many successful people have smoked or still do smoked weed (many Presidents of the United States, famous scientists such as Carl Sagan, and countless musicians, writers and artists; (7) It's not physically addictive (it's really only addictive in the sense that fun is addictive, fun is addictive in many things besides weed), some people get addicted to television for example); (8) It's no more of a gateway drug than alcohol (most pot smokers eventually end of quitting having over done any other drug besides alcohol).



Thus, I think marijuana should be legalized.
Ian
2012-05-03 20:11:09 UTC
the reason marijuana is still illegal is that there are an enormous number of politicians who agree its a matter of time but continually vote/work against it being legal because they had to take that position to get elected. Unfortunately, when it comes to marijuana for the most part, our government representatives do not make decisions based on the people they represent but rather on the corporations that are going to give them the election money and in turn public support they need to get re-elected and continue having a career. Now, one may argue that if politicians must go against marijuana to gain much needed public support to get elected then clearly that is the will of the majority. To that there is no denying. but one must realize, the biggest reasons why there are still so many americans who want marijuana illegal are(in my opinion) the gateway theory, easier access for kids, and the notion that it is addictive. Those 3 arguments were pressed onto the american people by the reagan administration by providing very specific "evidence" (and I use that term very loosely because of the government studies that were intentionaly biased to support prohibition, such as the proof of the killing of brain cells.) in a specific way to make them reach illogical conclusions. The 3 arguments would and have been proven false by respected science institutions and in legitimate debate. Unfortunately still to this day americans accept those ideas as facts. There is so much propaganda on both sides of this argument, WAY WAY WAY moreso in the conservative view by the way, that the majority of americans do not know or understand the actual scientific facts of marijuana and continue to this day form their adamant opinions on this issue from false information. The argument of the legalization of cannabis has more false information being accepted as fact by the american people than any other issue our nation has faced in the past century. It is as if the government has thrown a viel over its people that was so effective that even now when the arguments have been proved false, people still hold the old views. It is truly amazing how easily the government was able to control the amercian people on this issue. This was the biggest misuse of governmental power against the people in our nations history. And the thing I find most amazing is that even though the information is right in front of them and even though the american people realize the information is there...they still believe and accept what the government pressed into them all those years ago.



Starfire cuddle cakes is completely right in the fact there are people with pre existing psychological conditions that make them prone to become addicted and move on to harder drugs. Thats actually something that I have been telling people for years and thats the first time ive heard someone else who has made that realization

Unfortunately and this is what I was referenceing earlier, people will use that information in a very specific way so that they could ,in theory, go before congress or better yet national television, and make a legitimate arguement of. "evidence of people who exhibited addictive states in response to exposure" By not at all providing information as to who those people were and what there psychological states were before the test, A person hearing that would be mislead to make the conclusion marijuana is addictive.

Therefore the notion of some people being more likely to become addicted than others should not be used as an argument to support the contiuation of prohibition because it does not reference the properties of the substance in question and any arguments on this issue must be SOLELY based on

the properties of the substance alone.

To put it in other words the psychological tendencies of an individual cannot be shown as a negative to marijuana because those individuals could have become addicted to anything and just because it happened to be marijuana does not set marijuana apart from any of the other potential addictive behaviors.



The argument that there will be an increase in car crashes because more people will be smoking marijuana once again should not be used to make the conclusion that marijuana must remain illegal.

Just look at drunk driving accidents. When a drunk driver gets behind of the wheel and kills another human being,it is the fault of the individual for not acting as a responsible adult the cause is not concluded to be due to the legal status of alcohol.
younan
2017-01-19 18:20:54 UTC
i do no longer smoke it yet easily could prefer to have the excitement of attempting. Marijuana is a certainly occurring substance interior the Earth no count how a lot of people do no longer like it. they do no longer upload any chemical compounds in it like they do in cigarettes. that is extra effective than smoking cigarettes or ingesting by way of fact no one has EVER died from it!! Now of coarse people will Over exaggerate and mislead people approximately this PLANT to maintain people from smoking or ingesting it which sucks!! Marijuana has scientific purposes. to illustrate; It helps maximum cancers sufferers with their starvation. It additionally helps to lessen eye tension. the advantages of this plant out way the rest. that's a PLANT!!!! It replace into continuously right here!!! guy did no longer Make it!!! i think of the folk who in basic terms decide Marijuana without all the data are buying in to all the Lies approximately it and are slender minded!! you are going to be able to lose some concepts cells and could overlook somethings yet that incredibly relies upon on how the plant reacts alongside with your physique!! it is not the same for all and sundry. It provides the munchies and makes you sleepy. it is not that undesirable and that i do no longer think of that is going to be unlawful. i think of the reality approximately Marijuana could be cautioned. Now deliver on the thumbs down by way of fact i be attentive to there alot of persons who won't accept as true with me. by utilising the way people who smoke Marijuana are Cool and Groovy!!! there is no longer something wong with them. even nonetheless I don no longer smoke it ( yet ) I fairly have a good out seem on it and that i will get the data approximately something First before throwing out an EEEWWWwWW that is disgusting!! i think of smoking cigarettes is disgusting by way of fact it is not organic!! and you are going to be able to defiantly get Nasty Lung maximum cancers and different varieties of maximum cancers by utilising smoking that. yet weed is extra healthy.
Maximum Brandon
2012-05-03 20:02:42 UTC
Yeah.



Even disregarding it's healthiness (because it is actually bad for you), it would generate a ton of revenue for the government, and take a lot of criminals out of jail. So we'd be saving money in our prison system and gaining money through taxation. That alone is a strong basis for legalization.
sɐıɯnzıZ
2012-05-03 20:02:18 UTC
The only problem i have with it, is it is really hard to tell how much someone has had, so when someone is high, and they get pulled over, it would be hard to tell the quantity amount of how much they have had, to arrest them, or fine them. Alcohol, you have breath tests to test how much you have had to arrest.



Other than that, I don't really care. I don't do drugs, but some of my friends to Marijuana, and I don't really care. And actually, facts have proven that Marijuana IS unhealthy, for it as well breaks down your body after long abuse.
Bend Them Strings
2012-05-03 20:09:59 UTC
for no other reason than to make our broke *** govt more money, yes. but I would love to smoke a J if not for the ole p-in-a-cup threat at work.
nasty1
2012-05-04 05:19:51 UTC
no it shouldn't.im not going to waste time with a whole argument because most of you wouldn't listen any way.hope this helps.
K
2012-05-03 20:01:23 UTC
Yeah.
Koi
2012-05-03 20:01:11 UTC
If it gets people to shut up about it.



One of the most over-argued topics. Ugh.
Freedom Of Choice
2012-05-03 20:02:31 UTC
yep, it's not as dangerous as alcohol and it's got some good effects to it
Skylar
2012-05-03 20:01:05 UTC
Yes I do.
screaming_through_insanity
2012-05-03 20:00:41 UTC
I would support either decriminalization or legalization.
Atropelo
2012-05-03 20:01:59 UTC
YES I DO



THUMBS UP FOR WEED
Elle
2012-05-03 20:00:42 UTC
Don't care, gon smoke it anyway
Alive, She Cried☮
2012-05-04 13:37:22 UTC
Yes, it should.
Jeşşicɑ♥
2012-05-03 19:59:56 UTC
yes.
worst car
2012-05-03 20:07:11 UTC
Hell yes!
AppleJack
2012-05-03 20:01:41 UTC
It already is isn't it?


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...