What's the difference between Charles Manson & George Bush?
Gepetto
2007-06-27 23:26:29 UTC
Charlie never killed anybody, he just influenced his "Family Members" to kill. Bush did the same, & killed MANY more people
Where do you draw the line?
Thirteen answers:
2007-06-27 23:30:20 UTC
Manson is in prison doing life, and Bush SHOULD be in prison doing life.
country girl 006
2007-06-27 23:46:38 UTC
Charles Manson is a murderer and is the devil. George Bush is a human, trying to make the world a better place to live in for ALL people. Everybody makes mistakes sometimes - Manson IS A MISTAKE. He isn't worth the dirt we walk on. I know many people disagree with this about Bush, but in the beginning, he did a really good job. Give him some credit. It could have been worse - we could have had Hilary for President. I think her and Manson make a great couple!
neve_freak2001
2007-06-27 23:29:25 UTC
I think the difference is George Bush doesn't have a swastika (visibly) tattooed on him.
Professor Riddle
2007-06-27 23:33:59 UTC
Charlie would share his drugs with you.George will do it behind everybodies back secretly,but outwardly would want the death penalty for drug users.
GoodJuJu2U
2007-06-27 23:29:42 UTC
I'll have to go with the tattoo on the forehead. Only difference I can see.
2007-06-27 23:38:58 UTC
Bush has oily hands.
2007-06-27 23:37:44 UTC
well you have to admit, george dubya has charlie beat in looks. charlie is one ugly mo fo!
2007-06-28 01:24:36 UTC
At least Charlie was able to get laid when he was younger!
2007-06-27 23:30:21 UTC
Bush asshole is much bigger than Charles
2007-06-27 23:29:53 UTC
kill them
2007-06-27 23:29:58 UTC
he was voted President.
2007-06-27 23:35:03 UTC
SHUT UP!!!! And go read Pinocchio again....!
2007-06-27 23:29:52 UTC
Dunno Charles Manson , but Geprge Bush is mad.For sure
ⓘ
This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.