OJ has always maintained his innocence and his recent hypothetical book should be available and people have a CHOICE whether to read it or not. OJ is likely not being narcissistic and a great portion of the book is probably defending himself against false allegations. Here's a few things that the jury may have considered:
-The investigator who found the glove later committed PERJURY regarding his extreme racist comments.
- Another investigator took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scenes.
- The glove DID NOT fit OJ's hand (wrong size).
- There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, house or car CONSISTENT with someone who had committed that crime in person..
- The murder weapon was NEVER connected to him or found.
- The jury was taken to visit OJ's house and DID NOT see the rumored large blood trail.
- There were no witnesses to the actual crime.
Likely the jury found him innocent because there was a LACK of real evidence to convict.
Some may disagree with the verdict but it's unfair for them to say with absolute certainty that this man is guilty.
Read this:
http://members.aol.com/CntrbndMag/oj.html
One of the World's top forensics scientists Dr. Henry Lee who worked on the case during the trial and saw the evidence, wrote a very good book "Cracking Cases" and makes some interesting points about OJ not being the one who did this unfortunate crime.