Question:
POLL: Who is the better model PICS?
2008-12-30 00:49:26 UTC
Who is the better model? PICS?
These two girls are both models. Who looks like they would be a better model? Who is prettier?

Girl 1 is 5'6 144 lbs
Girl 2 is 5'7 113 lbs

I put all the pics onto one page, easier for you =]

GO TO MY PAGE TO SEE THE PICS, Y!A WONT LET ME ADD THEM HERE.

Thankyou =]
Fifteen answers:
Fort Knox 19D Soldier
2008-12-30 00:52:52 UTC
I think girl 2
boudah
2016-10-25 08:10:05 UTC
For all intents and applications they are all technically the same sword. there is a few diffused version contained in the blades, maximum particularly the position the bohi ends when it comes to the yokote (the bohi extends over the yokote in sword #2). The hamon kinds are diverse, that is rather a classy characteristic. also, there seems some version contained in the kissaki. except that the in effortless words actual vast difference is the hardware (e.g. the tsuba, kashira, etc.). The Musashi swords are quite lower priced. those are mass produced swords, so technically they don't look quite generating blades which variety in toughness, sharpness, function, etc. if truth be told what they are in all probability doing is generating a lot of well-known blades, and then purely putting diverse hardware on them to distinguish the more than a number of "fashions". The Musashi swords are not any more, by the criteria of maximum sword faculties, perfect for tameshigiri. the undertaking is that even nonetheless they are marketed as carbon metal and "conflict waiting", they are oftentimes device solid "by hardened" mono-metal blades. which means the metal is the same hardness in the technique the full blade, as hostile to differentially hardened blades that are how classic katana are built (do not get me incorrect nonetheless, a differentially hardened blade that is less than $one hundred could be a lengthy way worse). a good by hardened blade needs to be balanced between being not basic adequate to carry an aspect and yet being smooth adequate to no longer destroy even as that's used (a sword that is purely too not basic can destroy, a sword that is purely too smooth will bend quite). At this budget you're in all probability going to probability getting a sword that has microfractures, cracks and rigidity which could ensue in the course of the water quench element of the production procedure. for this reason there are monosteel blades which could properly $one thousand. as well, the tsuka ito is wrapped very poorly on all 3 swords that is yet another clean indication of the overall high quality of each sword and what percentage steps were skipped and/or compromised to convey a sword into the sub-$one hundred variety. i does no longer advise any of those swords for reducing tatami. the fee-powerful sword that i believe is suitable for get admission to point tameshigiri is the Bugei Crane, that is about $239 - i imagine.
2008-12-30 00:59:52 UTC
I guess girl one, but both look like they're trying to hard to look like a model in their pics, and some pics aren't even modeling pics.



Don't get me wrong though, both are very pretty.
DevilDog
2008-12-30 00:53:49 UTC
girl 2
2008-12-30 00:56:37 UTC
im really not bothered going to the pics but probably girl 2 shes the cut of height for a model and skinnier
.
2008-12-30 00:58:14 UTC
Girl 2, girl 1 is very pretty but also very average. Girl 2 has a slightly more unique face.
2008-12-30 00:54:01 UTC
The 2nd girl looks mor elike a model. but they are both really pretty. The 1st girl looks really pretty in the top right corner.
Jessie
2008-12-30 01:00:27 UTC
Girl 1!!!!



Her features flow more, like a well put together puzzle.



Girl 2's seems a little mismatched. She she think about getting a different hair style.
kj :)
2008-12-30 00:55:55 UTC
girl 2.

i like her pictures better.

but the 1st one is pretty too.
2008-12-30 00:56:36 UTC
i usually like brunettes more than blonds but im likin the blond emore than the brunette but the brunette is more model material
happygolucky
2008-12-30 09:18:52 UTC
where is the link? I went to your page but there are no pics
2008-12-30 00:57:03 UTC
Yer both pretty, I guess girl two.
Gabiii
2008-12-30 00:54:58 UTC
Umm neither. The first is overweight for a model and neither of them have the face of models. although theyre "pretty" they just dont have the qualities if a model
Lorena Bobbitt
2008-12-30 00:53:00 UTC
You're both too short to model
2008-12-30 00:55:14 UTC
yall are fat.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...